Aristotelian Ethics And Kantian Ethics - 1303 Words

1. For Aristotle a virtue was something that all good characters had and which enable them to do the right thing. It is the ability to do good because you are a consistent person who is able to determine how much of a virtue needs each situation. Virtues themselves are desirable because they make life easier and more satisfying. 2. Aristotelian ethics is more concern with the personality of a person and their ability to do good without strict rules or guidance, while utilitarianism and Kantian tell you what your duty is and what you need to do to be a moral person. The responsibility always falls back to the person no matter what principle they follow, but Aristotelian ethics doesn’t condemn you if your decision leads to bad consequence or unhappiness. 3. Virtue ethics seems more realistic than utilitarianism and Kantian ethics because in virtue ethics we get to see good and bad traits more clearly rather than just having the same moral duty in all situations. I know that I value honesty as a virtue and I try to be honest with people whenever I can, if I think is good for them to know the truth. Because of my value of honesty, I once told someone a truth that they were not expecting and which resulted in more problems. I feel guilty now because it had bad consequences, but perhaps that was because I did not follow a golden mean – I was too honest for the situation, but that doesn’t mean I am a bad person, it probably means that I need to use my virtues wisely. If IShow MoreRelatedEthics, Kantian, And Aristotelian Theory959 Words   |  4 Pages Buddhist ethics, although likened to some Western ethical theories, is not in fact the same as those theories. The most common Western theories it is compared with are; Utilitar ianism, Kantian, and Aristotelian. Specifically, Utilitarianism does not address the meaning of being a good person in its definition of right action. Kant does not address the different classes as having different laws but believes in one set of universal laws and Aristotle believes in the perfection of a self that doesRead MoreMoral Theories Can Help Justify The Decisions That Are Made882 Words   |  4 Pagesmakes some actions right and others wrong. These are then used as a guide to making choices. They operate at a more general level than moral or legal principles and rules. The four main groups that one should be aware of are: Utilitarian, Kantian, Aristotelian and Feminist. Utilitarian Utilitarianism is based on maximizing human welfare, it is seen as the only way to determines the rightness of actions (Duignan, 2015). Furthermore, theory is in opposition to egoism, the view that a person shouldRead MoreAristotle s The Kindest Cut1808 Words   |  8 PagesThrough an analysis of Aristotelian and Kantian ethics and Wagner’s behavior, this essay will seek to identify and understand the moral worth of Wagner’s actions. First however, a concise and relevant summary of Aristotle’s moral philosophy will be provided. This summary will touch upon the primary theme of Aristotle’s moral philosophy, virtue and its relation to happiness and free will, and lastly Aristotle’s moral states. Next, a comparison of Kantian and Aristotelian ethics will be included to furtherRead MorePhilosophical Analysis of Aristotle883 Words   |  4 PagesAristotle Many theorists consider Aristotle to be the first person to use the term â€Å"ethics† in naming the field of study that had already been subject to develop by his predecessors Socrates and Plato. Philosophical ethics attempts in offering the rational response to the questions regarding how the human beings live. Aristotle used to be regarding politics and ethics as two related but very separate field of study because ethics examines the good concerning an individual, while politics is about examiningRead MoreAristotelian, Utilitarian And Kantian Moral Theories1422 Words   |  6 Pages Before we touch upon assessing the Aristotelian, Utilitarian and Kantian moral wrongness and their different approaches to evaluating their moral theories. We should get a better understanding of what exactly are morals and how each and every one of us goes about identifying such a concept. The primary concern of ethics is based around this notion of morality. Morality can be defined as a s et of fundamental rules that guide our actions. Most of the morals that each and every one of us embodyRead MoreImmanuel Kant s Ethical Theory1111 Words   |  5 Pagesutilitarianism theory explains option in paying the inspector $500.00 would be most preferable as it will maximise happiness for Ted, his employees and the inspector. Kantian Ethics Kant s ethical theory is deontological theory. In deontological theories actions are evaluated as ethical or unethical based on one duty. Kantian ethics theory includes duty for the sake of duty regardless to human happiness, unlike utilitarianism. Immanuel Kant defined duty as â€Å"the action which is objectively practicalRead MoreArgical Analysis Of Rosalind Hursthouses Virtue Ethics1175 Words   |  5 Pagesessay on Virtue Ethics, she aims to create a new type of ethics that is classified as aristotelian in nature. Hursthouse’s model is more agent-based rather than action-based, which implies that it is based on the individual’s characteristics rather than the type of action implemented. Although her discussion on virtue ethics is both intriguing and important, Hursthouses model falls short of being a viable ethical theory for several reasons. Firstly, the idea of agent-based ethics is a nice one inRead MoreHow Should One Live914 Words   |  4 Pagesexplore two of these perspectives; Aristotelian virtue ethics and Kantian duty ethics. Moral philosophy is to depict the absolute ideal (Sullivan, 1980), Aristotelian virtue ethics argues that a virtuous eudemonic life constitutes a moral one. Kant differs; morality is rational and the categorical imperative it to be abided by to live as such. Aristotle is the main proponent in the field of virtue ethics, culminating in the seminal work on the Subject; Nicomachean Ethics (NE). NE recognises a life wellRead MoreA Proper Moral Guideline For A Rational Being1664 Words   |  7 Pagesconsequentialism, which is supported by Bentham and Mill, Kantian ethics which is essentially penned by Kant, and virtue ethics, of which Aristotle’s version would be the best example to represent that field of theory. The essence of this argument lies in what the three theories seek in order to understand our moral limits in accordance to positive and negative reaction of such ideas and overall acceptance and application of such theories; with virtue ethics being the basis of the argument contribute to creatingRead MoreThe Ethical Theories Of Aristotle And Immanuel Kant1910 Words   |  8 Pagestreated the virtuous person as sensing good about being good. Kant and Aristotle share the opinion, that ordinary human reason is adequate for the explanation of a complete ethical approach and the course of human existence. God’s role in Kantian and Aristotelian ethics is restricted by what ordinary human ground may determine by its lights, and doesn’t depend on belief in divine exposure. In Aristotle’s case, he didn’t claim to have the advantage of any supernatural exposure, and in Kant’s, though he